Archive for the ‘Books’ Category

Publication News: Friends Edition

March 5, 2010 - 7:09 pm 2 Comments

The lovely Miss Rose Lemberg has had announced a sale at Strange Horizons (which for those unawares is really epic and awesome and I love this market).

Also, Christie Yant has made a pro sale! I cannae say the market, because it is a sekrit at the moment, but let it be known that it is Truly Legitimately Awesome.

And last but biggest is that Wendy Wagner has gone and sold a novel! When I see her, I’m going to throw glitter square in her face.

Metacognition and Self-Publishing

January 29, 2010 - 6:32 pm 8 Comments

There have been two recent events that contribute to this blog post.

One of the events, which becomes two events if you slice it right, is the creation of a “self-publishing branch” by two professional publishers, Harlequin and Thomas Nelson. These events have caused a lot of drama (warning: epic thread is epic, and massive timesink of external linking). To sum: RWA, MWA, and SFWA have dropped both publishers from their lists of acceptable publishing credits. The well-respected publishing watchdog Writer Beware has relatively scathing posts about these two moves. WB is definitely not an alarmist blog, and is very careful about the language used concerning publishers, due to living under persistent threat of lawsuit. So if WB calls you out in unequivocal language, son, you done fucked up.

The other is that I rediscovered this article. Which is a lot less to read than the above.

If you ever hit up any of these “self-publishing” sites for testimonials (more on the scare quotes later) you’ll see hearts like cups filled with effervescence, spilling over in their joy of having Their Story in book form, surrounded by stock photos of Not The Actual Author Because They Can’t Smile Quite As Disarmingly As This Soft-Focused Photo Of A Woman Done In Pastels.

These publishers, in their efforts to entice you, will engage in a persuasive speech of the downtrodden author, kept down by “the man” as embodied by traditional publishing, mocked openly by the gatekeepers who presume to call themselves literary agents, the verysame agents who go on to demand a sizable portion of your hard-won advance for doing something so simple as passing your manuscript to an editor. Their arguments are propped up by strawmen at best, and like all modern persuasive speeches, they’re going to net only Kool-Aid drinkers and the uninformed. The rest of us know better.

But I’m not really interested in persuading the Kool-Aid drinkers to change their ways. I’ve said it before, I’m saying it again, and I’ll keep saying it: I’m selfish, my time is valuable, and I’m not going to waste it. If anyone should be enticed by dreamily-painted arguments instead of numbers and fact, then I don’t mind seeing their wallet molested because they feel Night Travels of the Elven Vampire “deserves to be read.”

As far as convincing those who are unaware of this world? There are many other places that can help them far better than I can. WB as listed above, AbsoluteWrite, and the still-useful Snarkives do this and I’m not a fan of doubling work.

Aside: Before I get into what I wanted to discuss, I’ll clarify those scare quotes. Self-publishing and Vanity Publishing are two different things. Self-publishing is where the author owns the ISBN and the product. Vanity publishing is where the author does not. They both require out-of-pocket expenditure to have the final product of a sheaf of paper with a glossy page on either end, both will not likely land in bookstores, and both require authors to bust their asses to get people other than close kith and kin to buy the books. But self-publishing tends not to lie about what it is. Vanity does. Especially on the points I listed.

Aside, continued: Legitimate self-publishing is, in my opinion, pretty awesome. It lets you bind your family history in a book. It lets you collect grandma’s recipes to hand to your kids and their kids. It helps make your niche paper on the parallels of microorganism reproduction and Internet memes accessible to the public. It doesn’t get your book mentioned on Oprah, but it gets your work out to interested audiences. And, you own said book. Not so with Vanity, which targets a different audience (hopeful novelists) with a different goal (you might get discovered this way and become all super-famous and shit).

Anywhoozle.

For those who didn’t want to read the article I linked (that’s okay, it’s six pages for a small point) I’ll summarize it here, sloppily: people with self-control do better in life. For those of you who did read the article (good job): yes, a lot more than that happened in the article, but that’s all I care about, and I’d be very happy if you went along with me on that one point, thanks.

The Marshmallow Experiment. You set a marshmallow in front of a child. Tell them if they don’t eat it for fifteen minutes, then they get a second marshmallow. Some children are able to resist. Others are not. The children who said no to the marshmallow in favor of two marshmallows have, across the board, done better in life, because they were able to weigh short-term gain and long-term gain.

You see where I’m going with this.

Vanity presses are the now-marshmallow. It’s the one sitting on your desk, teasing you. Give in and you’ll have that book in your hands tomorrow! Professional, traditional publishing is the later-marshmallow. Why wasn’t your novel published? Well, because it sucks and you need to work on that. Maybe your characters are flat. Maybe your prose is dead on the page. Maybe your story isn’t compelling. You’re trying to sell your book to people who love books, both pre- and post-publication. The masses who pick up DaVinci Code are not your audience. The people who just “pop in to have a quick look” and walk out with an armful of new titles because omg I didn’t know he’d just released a new book, and I’ve heard a lot about this series I should check it out, and I totally love her medical mysteries and she blurbed this other author’s medical mystery so I want to read that, and… you get the idea. This is your audience. And these people? They’ve read a lot. A lot. They’re going to be harder to convince of how awesome your book is.

Writing is hard. Your first draft needs work. Your first novel isn’t likely to get published (but zomg it took a year to write!). But if you work at your craft with your eye on the distant prize of being a Professional Author instead of just a hobbyist and ignore the temptation of just having a book in your hands with your name on it, you’re going to be a fair sight better off.

This is the metacognition part. Think about how you think about publishing. Do you think being published is a human right, alongside clean water and a Louis Vuitton bag? Well, it’s not. Never was. It is the result of hard work, diligence, and a creative streak, and in this like all things the world owes you nothing. If the temptation of Vanity presses prove overwhelming, play metacognative tricks. Ignore the low-hanging fruit which is rotted at the core. Pretend it doesn’t exist. Play with your stories, worlds, characters. Read more. Go to conventions. Blog. When a Vanity press creeps into your periphery, turn your head and focus.

And if you honestly hate working at the craft of writing, find something better to do. Painting, interior design, blacksmithing, I don’t care. If you really want to write stories but don’t want to deal with serious publication, I suggest posting online and pursuing fanfiction. Scratches the writing itch, you get to share your work, and there’s no cost out of pocket. Just don’t waste your time doing something for the wrong reasons that makes you unhappy. You time is as precious as mine is.

Say no to the Now Marshmallow. Find your Later Marshmallow and go get it.

SF in SF — VanderMeer and Browne

November 16, 2009 - 8:29 pm No Comments

Before I open with this post, I would like to recommend against using the Add an Image button in Wordpress admin if you’re running Chrome. The whole process crashed, and something has been fractured on a very basic level. I cannot type in web addresses anymore. It attempts to search for everything. Getting back to the Add New Post page was a hassle on its own.

That said, I had an image to post for the goings-on this Saturday. You’ll have to wait until my memory kicks in outside of work. Probability of this happening is low.

Emily and I trekked on up to the city for SF in SF, primarily because Jeff was going to be reading from FINCH (which he did wonderfully, and I need to go read it already, because I’m terrible). (Also, that’s a lot of links.) Wound up also liking Scott Browne’s book BREATHERS enough to trust his suggestion that I read more Palahniuk (I’m not linking Palahniuk, he doesn’t need my help, and there’s enough links up there anyway).

Briefly…

FINCH is the fifth and “last” novel in the Ambergris series. Finch is a detective working to solve a double-murder in the true fashion of a noir novel, but set in an Ambergris now ruled by the sinister Greycaps, a completely foreign species who subjugate the people, their actions driven by misunderstanding and malice. Would appeal to fans of noir looking for something with an edge of horror (memory spores?) and the fantastic, or to fans of urban fantasy who miss the genre when it wasn’t paranormal romance rebranded.

BREATHERS is a novel about zombies and their plight as sentient beings in the unaccepting world of the living, the narrator a zombie with a persistently detached dry humor. Would appeal to fans of Palahniuk who want the guy to take himself less seriously.

Here’s my tip to you: don’t show up to these things late. Emily and I scooted in t-minus one minute before the reading proper was to begin, and we stood in the doorway awkwardly. Then we were informed “There are seats in the front.” Rows upon rows of plush seats not unlike a movie theatre were packed full, but we trusted the words whispered to us and shot off for the front row.

And yes, there were seats. On folding chairs set maybe a foot back from the authors’ table. I could have set my water on there. Instead I just leaned in awkwardly and stared at Jeff.

Another tip to you: don’t do that. The awkward-lean thing. You get branded, poorly.

Afterwards a good lot of us toddled up to The View for drinks, and if you haven’t been there, it’s not unlike standing on the viewing deck of the Death Star, overlooking the San Francisco skyline on either side. The booze is overpriced and underpoured (I asked for a Jameson sour and got a twelve-dollar lemonade) but you’re there for the view and I was driving back to south bay anyway. And if that was the cover charge, totally worth it to hang out with Emily, Jeff, Jean (EIC of SF/SF ezine), and new friend Espana.

No music post today. I’m just tapping my toes to some Mountain Goats. I’ve mentioned their song Lovecraft in Brooklyn before (link is actually a remix by Aesop Rock). Today it’s This Year.

ToC Wankery: The Mamoth Book of Mindblowing SF

August 3, 2009 - 10:27 pm No Comments

Today, SF Signal — one of the better scifi blogs, if you ask me, certainly leagues above io9, but I digress — posted a ToC from The Mammoth Book of Mindblowing SF.

Here it is, in case we lose the post:

  1. “Out of the Sun” by Arthur C. Clarke
  2. “The Pevatron Rats” by Stephen Baxter *
  3. “The Edge of the Map” by Ian Creasey
  4. “Cascade Point” by Timothy Zahn
  5. “A Dance to Strange Musics” by Gregory Benford
  6. “Palindromic” by Peter Crowther
  7. “Castle in the Sky” by Robert Reed *
  8. “The Hole in the Hole” by Terry Bisson
  9. “Hotrider” by Keith Brooke
  10. “Mother Grasshopper” by Michael Swanwick
  11. “Waves and Smart Magma” by Paul Di Filippo *
  12. “The Black Hole Passes” by John Varley
  13. “The Peacock King” by Ted White & Larry McCombs
  14. “Bridge” by James Blish
  15. “Anhedonia” by Adam Roberts *
  16. “Tiger Burning” by Alastair Reynolds
  17. “The Width of the World” by Ian Watson
  18. “Our Lady of the Sauropods” by Robert Silverberg
  19. “Into the Miranda Rift” by G. David Nordley
  20. “The Rest is Speculation” by Eric Brown *
  21. “Vacuum States” by Geoffrey A. Landis
  22. * = New story written for this anthology

    As I said in the comments:

    Well, there’s the joke that SF is dominated by old, white men. If you take that perspective, this ToC is quite certainly representative of the genre.

    :: sigh :: Oh, well. There’s another missed opportunity for SF to really show what it’s got.

    The shameful thing is that while these are all quite good authors, there’s so much more to the genre. I ever so like Clarke, and Di Fillipo, and Zahn, and others on the list. But there’s no Butler, Le Guin, or Moon, or Delany. And those are just the ones I can name off the top of my head.

    We can argue whether or not there’s an editorial responsibility to accurately represent genre when you label your collections as such. We can also argue whether or not the stories are mindblowing.

    However, I simply find it surprising that the names I listed weren’t on the list. They’re not exactly light steppers in the genre, and it’s not like they’ve never written a short story in their lives. Even then, they could have been approached to produce new stories, as the anthology obviously accepted new stories.

    It’s just a bit glaring, is all. Another little tickmark, along the lines of this bullshit with EA, which consistently shows that SF and genre and geekery in general are a place for the outcast to feel less alone and excluded and ridiculed, so long as they’re a male WASP.

    But like I said, :: sigh :: oh well. Mike Ashley just became one in a series, instead of taking a step towards standing out and being truly mindblowing.

Projects, Projects, Projects, and some Wankery

July 29, 2009 - 1:25 pm No Comments

It’s rare I kvetch about writing on here, simply because I’m still very much an amateur and thusly have little weight behind my words.

But this bullshit was pretty awesome. I missed all of this because I was at Comic-Con. But now I’ve caught up. It was delicious. Many thanks to Shweta for making me aware.

Anyway, I said projects in the title so I’ll flub about on those.

Current Novel is still untitled, but I’ve been calling it The Runner Novel, so I’ll keep going with that (though I’m looking for a good symbol for metamorphosis that isn’t a butterfly, if any of you can think of something…). I’m at a little over 60K, and considering I started in early April I feel that’s pretty good for a rookie.

Finished a short named Doll which I’m editing, currently at a little over 3K but I have a feeling I need to expand on one of my characters, and I think it’ll be brushing against 4K by the time I finish.

Lastly, I believe I have a friend who will be my artist-type for Steampunk Samurai Graphic Novel AKA Zodiac, which has me really stoked.

Oh, and I need to get back on editing the script for Wolf (comic), so I have something to show Dale Mettam for all my posturing.

That’s about all, I suppose. My own existence is largely uninteresting. Maybe I’ll be heading off to the Floating Market up in San Francisco, which Kat discovered just this past week.

Comic-Con: Day the Second, Third, and Final

July 27, 2009 - 6:22 pm No Comments

I realized I needed a wrap-up post for Comic-Con. Because you care, and I care that you care, and you care that I care.

The problem with Bill Willingham is that he wants more readers, just not you. He made this abundantly clear by wasting easily a fourth of the Fables panel mocking the television-viewers in the room, instead of talking about Fables-related things. Sir, I understand you’re bitter that the line to 6DE wrapped thrice on itself solely because of Venture Brothers and nothing to do with yourselves, but it’s not very classy when you let it hang out like that.

9 looks promising. District 9 will either be amazing or shit.

Doc Hammer cannot seem to remember that the room might be populated with those under the age of eighteen, even when reminded.

Audience Member: I just wanted to start off by saying, Mr Publick, I’m sorry for trying to lure you to my hotel room last night.

Jackson Publick: Were you?

Audience Member: You were pretty drunk.

Doc Hammer: Wait, where the hell was I when this happened?

Jackson Publick: Probably drunk too.

Doc Hammer: [to audience member] Damnit, why didn’t you ask me? I could have been waking up in your tub right now.

This only got worse as the panel continued…

Audience Member 2: Just wanna start by saying I love you guys…

Doc Hammer: And I love you. Let’s go back to your hotel room. Can we get that first guy involved? The one with the glasses? You and I can do a high-five over him.

James Urbaniak: So I just noticed… on the back of these little nameplates, it says: “Please be aware that some of your audience members might be under the age of eighteen, and that you are advised to keep the content of your panel appropriate for this audience.”

Doc Hammer: … [staring at this second audience member] … [realizes he looks a little young] …

Jackson Publick: You know what we should be talking about? Vegetables.

Doc Hammer: Yeah! And when I say ‘get it up and keep it up’ I mean your grades.

This was some of the milder stuff. My hobby during this was to watch Keith Crofford simply react.

Watchmen was fun, if for no other reason than Zack Snyder wound up accidentally hosting a food drive simply from being asked if he preferred smooth or crunchy peanut butter (so you do not freak out, I believe the answer was smooth). An audience member cried out that he must have jelly, to which he replied: “I don’t want any jelly that could possibly have come from this audience.”

In the end, a good time was had by all. And I received an ARC of THE CHILD THIEF, which is great so far. Was pretty sold on THE MAZE RUNNER but, alas, no ARC to be had.

Helpful Comments from Gene Yang

June 8, 2009 - 2:31 pm No Comments

Saturday I saw Gene Yang at Books Inc in downtown Mountain View, CA. He did the usual spiel about his latest publication, his career, et cetera, and was really rather nice and charming about the whole thing.

What I loved, though, was in the last fifteen or so minutes, we the audience made a comic with him. At the start, I thought it was a cute exercise, and I like seeing into someone’s creative process, even if it’s just a fly-by view of it.

Through the process he stated some obvious things (make sure the reader can tell your characters apart, your story needs an arc) but the end point was what I liked. It was something I had an intuitive idea of, but more on the prose side than on the comics side, and never really put into words.

The story is split in two parts: internal and external. Displaying the story is split in two parts: art and words. And those two pieces have to each carry half the story. Meaning you can have (1) art carry the internal and words carry the external or (2) art carry the external and words carry the internal.

We made a three-panel comic, one where the art carried the internal and words carried the external, and one the opposite. After, we got into a (brief) discussion about which is better. (I ruined it by saying my opinion, which made Gene say “Yeah, that’s the point I was going to get to, after hopefully some discussion.” Whoops :( ) (Oh, and my opinion was you need both, you need a balance, pick which best suits the specific scene, and you really need to keep changing it up to keep the reader from getting bored/tired.)

As I said, I’ve had an intuitive grasp of this, in prose. But I never had it explicitly stated and I thought it was useful noob advice. And it’s advice that goes beyond comics.

Now, I know for many of you this will probably be pretty obvious. But having it laid (lain?) out so explicitly was really awesome.

(Also if Gene Yang happens to stumble on this, hi, I was one of the three at the end who took the comic we generated. Specifically, I was the Warren Ellis fan :) ).

A Round of Good Things

April 15, 2009 - 2:19 pm 4 Comments

Emily’s recent flurry of posts make me realize I’ve been a terrible friend in talking about how awesome my friends are for what they’ve sold. (Except for Robert, I’ve been on top of that one.)

First is Shweta Narayan (livejournal), number one for her amazing story Nira and I (really, go read it, it’s a beautiful, dreamy voice and just lovely in every way) on Strange Horizons, and number two for making her third pro sale qualifying her for membership in SFWA (!!!).

Second is a recent congrats due to Isaac Espriu for his own first pro sale, for a flash piece! Apparently this is his first pro sale, to a Qualifying Market meaning two more and he’s in SFWA as well, and from hearing how diligent he is in sending things out I’m betting that’s right ’round the corner.

And third, I also recall one Rose Lemberg got herself in the Rhysling, for her poem Odysseus on the War Train, and I don’t know that I said a word about it. And I’d love to tell you more than simply saying “wow” but I’m not particularly good at dissecting the poetries, so I suppose it means you’ll have to read it for yourself. I walked away from it feeling a cool weight, a sort of sad heaviness without being dragged down just weighed upon, and that’s really about as far as I get with poems.

This is what I love about my friends. They’re all such hard workers, so dedicated to what they do. No flim-flam wannabe crap going on here. Shweta’s working on something new every time I talk to her, Isaac’s making reportable progress on his novel each day, Rose is not only a dedicated writer but so willing to help, as is Shweta, as are all these folk, really, and Emily whom I mentioned above is going absolutely nuts on her thesis right now, writing day and night.

And this doesn’t go to mention Robert, who’s written two novels in the year-and-change I’ve known him (novels better than I could ever write), or Carla who writes, seriously, Every Goddamn Day, has an agent, and happens to be the first Real Writer Friend I done ever had.

I guess, in the end, I’m really lucky to know these folk, and I gotta work on making them feel lucky to know me :)

Diabolical Plans

April 2, 2009 - 7:15 pm No Comments

Robert: Here’s some writerly advice: If you ever have an evil character, and you want them to lay out their evil plans… if it’s a dude, have him do it while he’s pissing.

I don’t know why, but that just makes it so much more… contemptuous.

I’ve always wanted to do it, but never have.

Ian McKellen changed the opening soliloquy of Richard III to him pissing in a corner and saying, “Now is the winter of our discontent, made glorious summer by this son of York…” It was awesome.

me: I’ll… um. I’ll let you have that one.

(I err on the side of not having villains explain their diabolical plans. Primarily by not having villains.)

Robert: Probably a good idea.

But it’s a great introduction.

me: It seems like it could backfire though.

Normally, the bad guy is just revealing his whole plan, which is usually followed by said plan’s undoing.

Robert: Yeah.

me: But now, he’s got his penis in his hands.

Robert: I guess it’s just a matter of timing.

me: I guess so.

Don’t forget to look for his book, Mr Shivers, due out January 2010!

Coraline Review

February 6, 2009 - 10:26 am No Comments

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yGVOjnhzhU]

Saw Coraline in 3D last night.

For the unfamiliar (how can you be, at this point?) Coraline is a story of a young girl dissatisfied with her parents, alone in a new town. And through a secret door, she finds the Other world, a perfect world of best meals, beautiful gardens, and constant games, strung together by her Other Mother. Except that this fantastic other world is a trap set to lure children away, for the Other Mother, the Beldam, to devour their lives and snatch their eyes.

If you like Henry Selick (Nightmare Before Christmas, James and the Giant Peach) you’ll like this. It’s very similar-but-not-same, visually, because he’s got a distinct style, though I see him pulling from the modern school of animation (which pulls from an almost-twenty-year-old pushing-boundaries school of animation) and integrating it with his style flawlessly.

Script is good. Voice acting is good. The story is well done and I feel stays very true to the book. My friends claimed it was scary, but I wasn’t that creeped out by it. They also claimed they wouldn’t take their children to it, but I would. It really wasn’t that frightening. Maybe at moments, but it’s okay for children to get scared once in awhile. Helps spinal development.

Now, I’m not entirely sold on the 3D concept. My friends were pretty stoked on it, but I’m not sure it impacted the movie-watching experience to the point that I’d insist people try to see it 3D. Still, the 3D tricks (things coming out at you) weren’t overused, and they weren’t used at poor moments, so the 3D definitely doesn’t detract at all. Simply a flavor choice, here.

In the end? Highly recommended. See and enjoy. Bring the kids.